For the purpose of human relations, “I” is a loser and “We” is a winner. One of the biggest deterrents to social harmony is the war of egos. “We” need to learn to approach our endeavors with an attitude of how “we” can accomplish any given thing instead of an attitude of how can “I” do this and get bragging rights for it. This is common knowledge that is usually ignored. Old saws such as “2 heads are better than one” demonstrate that “we” know this concept to be true. Imagine if our 2 political parties could put aside their childish and petty bickering and work together what wonders could be achieved. “We” could restore this nation to a place of respect instead of ridicule. “We” could be a model for the world to follow instead of being snickered at by even the most backward of nations. This thinking in the plural rather than the singular should apply throughout society, no matter the size of the group; couple, nation, or world.
Even Mr. Butts realized the value of “We” over “I”. In his Scrabble game (originally called Lexico) he assigned 5 points for “We” and only 1 point for “I”.
There would be far fewer divorces if couples would adopt the idea of “we” and banish the concept of “I”. It would be better to have a casual living together arrangement if either party is inclined to thinking “I”. Save marriage for those that are truly committed to 2 becoming 1. If you enter the relationship with the thought that “we” are going to build a life together instead of “I” can make this marriage work, then you are more likely to seek solutions (together) to the problems that will most certainly arise. If only one of you is seeking a solution you will find none that work for long.
“We” should leave the “I” business to the likes of the Trumps, the Gingrichs, and the Iacoccas. When you see congress on TV, don’t you immediately think of what self-centered, egotististical , spoiled brats they are? The sort of people you want running this country are going to have strong egos, but you should also insist that they have enough intelligence to realize that governing is a joint effort when done correctly. “We” have some now that cry when they don’t get their way and if the trend continues, “we” may soon see one hold their breath in an attempt to get their pet legislation passed. It won’t work because all the rest are only interested in their own personal agenda.
The big problem is how do “we” get intelligent people to run for political office? I’m talking about people with the wisdom to run a country, not those with bought credentials that proclaim how smart they are. If a really bright star was to enter the arena, how would “we” separate that person from the dregs that clutter the field? “I” certainly don’t have the answer, but if enough of “us” think about it and discuss it among “ourselves”, “we” may be able to solve the problem.










